Available in iTunes and Amazon !! Learn Indian Classical Dance in Riyadh !!
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Celebrating ShankarabharaNam - 3- Brochevarevarura and Dialogues preceding the song
Song : Brochevarevarura and Dialogues preceding the song Composer / Lyricist : Mysore Vasudevacharya
Originally sung by : Vani Jeyaram, S. P. Balasubramaniyam Originally Arranged By : K. V. Mahadevan Movie : shankaraBharaNam
Dramatization and Dialogue Delivery: Narayanan Raju (Dasu) and Vamsikrishna Nadella (Shastri)
While I enjoyed the whole presentation as a package (the dramatization was indeed a breath of fresh air in blog uploads! Very innovative!) I do have reservations about the rendition of the keerthanam. Let me go on with the positives before I start picking :P One thing that was noteworthy was Srividya's "podi brighas"- like at 4:19 and 4:28; and Murali, as usual, good feel and clarity of words.
On the flipside, sorry, but this did not bring out the true flavor of Khamas IMHO. Not sure if the intention was to reproduce the film version (which I'm not familiar with) or recreate it. Even if this is how the original film version sounds, I would not be able to enjoy it. Khamas has trademark usages and every note has a unique stamp- like ma goes oscillating like gmgmgm... and ni2 most usually goes from dha (in fact like dsdsds) and from ma while going from below. These notes are NEVER flat. However, in this rendition, the "ra" of brocheva..revarura is sung as a flat ma which sounds odd. Similarly, in the swaram, in the line Sa ni... dha pa ma, ni dhaa.. pa ma ga, the first ni usually is sung as going from dha and the second from ma. But here, they seem to be flat as well. Many more instances like this throughout. And the second speed swaram seems to be faster and ahead of the beat. Sorry guys if I seem to be nitpicking, but Khamas is dear as life to me and I'm very fond of this song, so couldn't help! Murali, once again, great idea of doing this series and looking forward to the upcoming ones.
nice attempt. nalla bhavam. "nIku parAka" right way to split. Good diction over all.
The song is a composition of Mysore Vasudevachar and not Tyagaraja. (kaRirajunu brochina "VASUDEVUDAVU")
I can't remember how is it in the original song. But, the mridangam esp. during anupallavi chitta-swaram sounds a little jarring to my ears. It becomes worse during the chittaswaram rendition after the charanam.
Search for Shankarabharanam songs brought me here. Male voice is not open enough. Voice quality is not good. Strength in the voice and notes clarity is missing. Female voice is sweet.Bhaavam missing in both. Lack of training shows for both especially not being able to keep up with the taalam. Dialogues very well rendered. Classical songs need more practise and will be wonderful if recorded with care.
Interesting writeup! Well said! Wonderful dialogue delivery by Narayanan, Vamsi& vidya. What shastri spoke was difficult to understand. Waiting to see the movie with subtitles. The video clip you have attached was narrated by music master few yrs back. And recreating all this is simply wonderful! Hats off to each one of u. Feel blessed to be listening these!Superb singing Murali n Vidya! And special kudos to MEERA to make all this sound so great!
Ok guys- I just heard the original (movie version). Your version has done a fair justice to it. Its just that the original itself is not to my taste. While I still think that you could have improvised to adhere to Carnatic stds, apologies for the rather hasty comment before I heard the original.
Hi Murali, Beautiful rendition & a nice write up! And yes it only hurts so much to see kids singing sicker - vulgar lyrics (not knowing what it means). I very well remember how furious my bro used to get when we sing “Kokku chaiva kokku” Well…Now we have songs like “Chinna veeda varatuma periya veeda varattuma…”,"Meow!Meow poonai..",more n more! Room pottu yosipanga pola! Hell with such sick lyricists.
This is an evergreen - I know that is like saying the sun rises in the east, but to someone who doesn t understand the octaves much, like me, the song connects to my heart and so, I say, Murali - wnderful composition.
I agree with your opinion on 'remixes'. The remixes we see today are a miserable admission of the lack of originality and innovation . I hope remixes are banned from the market, to preserve the sanctity of music.
Just chanced upon ur blog...very interesting...you have a wonderful voice ....about the song... very nice attempt...but i felt ur voice needed to be more commanding ..i have heard the original many times over and felt Mr.SPB's voice being so powerful that it kept ringing in my ears days after too ...felt like you were just gliding over and not really emphasizing on all your notes..but practice can just help you there....
Hi Murali & Srividya - excellent! Murali's voice has a vintage quality to it while Srividya's, well, very sweet and versatile! A humble request to the blogger - please don't compare/judge between genres - ideally, a true music lover should be able to appreciate music irrespective of genres and be able to enjoy "nakkamukka" as much as Nagumomu, IMHO! As a kid, I grew up with carnatic music all around me while I totally hated (and ridiculed) it until a few years ago – I would enjoy Indian film music to classical rock to hardrock to grunge to heavymetal, but somehow never had the maturity to appreciate Indian classical music and it was fusion that got me interested - started with Eddie Vedder of Pearl Jam with Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan and then Indian Ocean and now I’m in love with not just carnatic, but also Hindustani, Khawali, etc, so point I’m trying to make is, if not for fusion, I wouldn’t have had the opportunity to see that glimpse of greatness in our own music, which led me to where I’m now! Hence, remix or not, music should never be discriminated on the basis of genre IMHO. BTW, there are so many fusion bands out there, but very few of them seem to get it right and this band called Mrigya – they are brilliant! As for some comments, well, people need to realize that covers are mostly sung for the gratification of the singers and as a tribute to the artists – they have no intent to imitate or sound like the original, so please refrain from making such naive comments! Finally, Sindhuja Bhakthavatsalam - I know I'm 2 years late in replying to this post so chances of you taking notice of this comment are very slim to none, but nonetheless, I gotta say this - you may like to call yourself a purist and enjoy that tag in your circles, but you have absolutely no right whatsoever in interfering with the freedom of what someone does with Kamas or any raga they like. Music's like open-source and anyone can do what they please, so stop dictating terms and being a phony that you are!
While I enjoyed the whole presentation as a package (the dramatization was indeed a breath of fresh air in blog uploads! Very innovative!) I do have reservations about the rendition of the keerthanam. Let me go on with the positives before I start picking :P
ReplyDeleteOne thing that was noteworthy was Srividya's "podi brighas"- like at 4:19 and 4:28; and Murali, as usual, good feel and clarity of words.
On the flipside, sorry, but this did not bring out the true flavor of Khamas IMHO. Not sure if the intention was to reproduce the film version (which I'm not familiar with) or recreate it. Even if this is how the original film version sounds, I would not be able to enjoy it.
Khamas has trademark usages and every note has a unique stamp- like ma goes oscillating like gmgmgm... and ni2 most usually goes from dha (in fact like dsdsds) and from ma while going from below. These notes are NEVER flat. However, in this rendition, the "ra" of brocheva..revarura is sung as a flat ma which sounds odd. Similarly, in the swaram, in the line Sa ni... dha pa ma, ni dhaa.. pa ma ga, the first ni usually is sung as going from dha and the second from ma. But here, they seem to be flat as well.
Many more instances like this throughout.
And the second speed swaram seems to be faster and ahead of the beat.
Sorry guys if I seem to be nitpicking, but Khamas is dear as life to me and I'm very fond of this song, so couldn't help!
Murali, once again, great idea of doing this series and looking forward to the upcoming ones.
Murali,
ReplyDeletenice attempt. nalla bhavam. "nIku parAka" right way to split. Good diction over all.
The song is a composition of Mysore Vasudevachar and not Tyagaraja. (kaRirajunu brochina "VASUDEVUDAVU")
I can't remember how is it in the original song. But, the mridangam esp. during anupallavi chitta-swaram sounds a little jarring to my ears. It becomes worse during the chittaswaram rendition after the charanam.
Search for Shankarabharanam songs brought me here.
ReplyDeleteMale voice is not open enough. Voice quality is not good. Strength in the voice and notes clarity is missing. Female voice is sweet.Bhaavam missing in both. Lack of training shows for both especially not being able to keep up with the taalam.
Dialogues very well rendered.
Classical songs need more practise and will be wonderful if recorded with care.
- Sashi
Interesting writeup! Well said!
ReplyDeleteWonderful dialogue delivery by Narayanan, Vamsi& vidya. What shastri spoke was difficult to understand. Waiting to see the movie with subtitles. The video clip you have attached was narrated by music master few yrs back.
And recreating all this is simply wonderful! Hats off to each one of u. Feel blessed to be listening these!Superb singing Murali n Vidya! And special kudos to MEERA to make all this sound so great!
Ok guys- I just heard the original (movie version). Your version has done a fair justice to it. Its just that the original itself is not to my taste. While I still think that you could have improvised to adhere to Carnatic stds, apologies for the rather hasty comment before I heard the original.
ReplyDeleteHi Murali,
ReplyDeleteBeautiful rendition & a nice write up!
And yes it only hurts so much to see kids singing sicker - vulgar lyrics (not knowing what it means). I very well remember how furious my bro used to get when we sing “Kokku chaiva kokku” Well…Now we have songs like “Chinna veeda varatuma periya veeda varattuma…”,"Meow!Meow poonai..",more n more! Room pottu yosipanga pola! Hell with such sick lyricists.
This is an evergreen - I know that is like saying the sun rises in the east, but to someone who doesn t understand the octaves much, like me, the song connects to my heart and so, I say, Murali - wnderful composition.
ReplyDeleteI agree with your opinion on 'remixes'. The remixes we see today are a miserable admission of the lack of originality and innovation . I hope remixes are banned from the market, to preserve the sanctity of music.
Hi Murali
ReplyDeleteJust chanced upon ur blog...very interesting...you have a wonderful voice ....about the song... very nice attempt...but i felt ur voice needed to be more commanding ..i have heard the original many times over and felt Mr.SPB's voice being so powerful that it kept ringing in my ears days after too ...felt like you were just gliding over and not really emphasizing on all your notes..but practice can just help you there....
Hi Murali & Srividya - excellent! Murali's voice has a vintage quality to it while Srividya's, well, very sweet and versatile! A humble request to the blogger - please don't compare/judge between genres - ideally, a true music lover should be able to appreciate music irrespective of genres and be able to enjoy "nakkamukka" as much as Nagumomu, IMHO! As a kid, I grew up with carnatic music all around me while I totally hated (and ridiculed) it until a few years ago – I would enjoy Indian film music to classical rock to hardrock to grunge to heavymetal, but somehow never had the maturity to appreciate Indian classical music and it was fusion that got me interested - started with Eddie Vedder of Pearl Jam with Nusrat Fateh Ali Khan and then Indian Ocean and now I’m in love with not just carnatic, but also Hindustani, Khawali, etc, so point I’m trying to make is, if not for fusion, I wouldn’t have had the opportunity to see that glimpse of greatness in our own music, which led me to where I’m now! Hence, remix or not, music should never be discriminated on the basis of genre IMHO. BTW, there are so many fusion bands out there, but very few of them seem to get it right and this band called Mrigya – they are brilliant!
ReplyDeleteAs for some comments, well, people need to realize that covers are mostly sung for the gratification of the singers and as a tribute to the artists – they have no intent to imitate or sound like the original, so please refrain from making such naive comments!
Finally, Sindhuja Bhakthavatsalam - I know I'm 2 years late in replying to this post so chances of you taking notice of this comment are very slim to none, but nonetheless, I gotta say this - you may like to call yourself a purist and enjoy that tag in your circles, but you have absolutely no right whatsoever in interfering with the freedom of what someone does with Kamas or any raga they like. Music's like open-source and anyone can do what they please, so stop dictating terms and being a phony that you are!